US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market

US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market


$ 3999

US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market valued at $5.628 Bn in 2022, projected to reach $8.637 Bn by 2030 with a 5.5% CAGR. The key driver of market growth is the rising demand for personalized medicine, driven by the need for individualized treatments based on genetic and molecular profiles, leading to more precise and successful therapies with minimized side effects. The US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market encompasses various players across different segments, including Takeda Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Bayer, CSL Behring, Grifols International, Octapharma, Xenetic Biosciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb etc, among various others.

ID: IN10USPH437 CATEGORY: Pharmaceuticals GEOGRAPHY: US AUTHOR: Dr. Netal Patel

Buy Now

US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market Executive Summary

US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market valued at $5.628 Bn in 2022, projected to reach $8.637 Bn by 2030 with a 5.5% CAGR.

A wide range of conditions that affect the composition, characteristics, and ability of blood to clot are together referred to as blood diseases. These diseases may be linked to abnormalities in platelets, white blood cells, red blood cells, or the plasma that carries nutrients, waste products, and hormones throughout the body. Blood disorders include anemia, which is defined by a deficiency of red blood cells or hemoglobin, leukemia, a kind of cancer that affects white blood cells, and hemophilia, a clotting disease that impairs the blood's ability to coagulate. Thrombocytopenia, a disorder characterized by low platelet counts, and sickle cell disease, an inherited illness that causes misshapen red blood cells, are both included in this wide group. Reducing symptoms is the aim of treatment; this may entail pain management, blood transfusions, or stem cell transplants. Thanks to developments in medical research, there are an increasing number of treatment options accessible, such as immunotherapies and targeted medications. The objectives of treatment plans are frequently to improve overall quality of life, increase blood cell counts, and lessen symptoms specific to each blood disorder.

Mns of Americans are affected by blood problems, which are common in the country. Approximately 100,000 Americans have been diagnosed with sickle cell disease, and an additional 2 Mn possess the sickle cell trait, making sickle cell disease the most prevalent genetic condition in the US. Hemophilia and sickle cell disease are two examples of non-malignant blood diseases whose incidence is predicted to increase over the coming decades.

The key driver of the US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market growth is the rising demand for personalized medicine, driven by the need for individualized treatments based on genetic and molecular profiles, leading to more precise and successful therapies with minimized side effects.

Due to its recent acquisition of Shire Plc and its broad range of approved factor replacement medicines, Takeda Pharmaceutical has the greatest market share for hemophilia A and B. Sanofi: In terms of market share, it trails quite closely. Among the group, Pfizer has the largest total revenue due to its broad range of products that address different blood diseases such as aplastic anemia, sickle cell disease, and hemophilia.

US blood disorder therapeutics market

Market Dynamics

Market Growth Drivers

Growing demand for personalized medicine: One of the main forces behind innovation and change in the healthcare industry is the rising need for individualized medication. Personalized medicine has great potential for more precise and successful medicines as it focuses on customizing treatments based on individual genetic and molecular profiles. This method offers a more accurate and patient-centered approach to healthcare by minimizing side effects while also improving treatment outcomes. Because of this, there is a noticeable rise in demand for customized treatment, which propels technological and scientific developments.

Raising patient awareness: Concurrently, the emergence of patient advocacy groups has helped raise public awareness of blood diseases. These organizations aggressively advocate for easier access to care, fostering an atmosphere that fosters market expansion. The combination of better awareness, better diagnoses, and advocacy work has resulted in a greater number of instances of blood diseases, such as hemophilia, sickle cell disease, leukemia, and lymphoma.

Increased prevalence: The increasing incidence of blood illnesses, particularly age-related ailments such as myelodysplastic syndromes and aplastic anemia, is partly attributed to the aging population. It is anticipated that the need for novel therapies and therapeutic interventions for blood problems will increase as the population becomes older. The importance of ongoing hematology research, development, and accessibility to state-of-the-art medicines is shown by this combination of circumstances.

Market Restraints

Financial constraint: Widespread accessibility is seriously hampered by the high cost of blood disease medicines, especially novel and gene therapies. This financial strain has an effect on payers as well as patients, which restricts adoption and impedes market expansion. These medicines' price structures are frequently opaque and complicated, which exacerbates the accessibility problem and reduces patient alternatives.

Unequal access to healthcare: The problem is made worse by the disparities in healthcare and insurance coverage that exist across various demographic groups. Racial, economic, and regional disparities pose obstacles that limit people's access to necessary treatments for blood disorders. In addition to creating differences in health outcomes, this also brings up moral questions about social fairness and healthcare equity.

Regulatory hurdles: Although necessary to guarantee safety and effectiveness, strict regulatory procedures for new medication approvals cause delays in the release of novel medicines. Long approval processes have the potential to stunt market expansion by denying patients prompt access to the newest developments in treatments for blood disorders. The healthcare sector has a delicate dilemma in balancing the requirement for strict regulatory supervision with the need to quickly make breakthrough medicines available to improve patient outcomes and spur market growth. Regulators, industry players, and advocacy organizations must work together to navigate through this complexity and create solutions that put safety and prompt access to cutting-edge therapies first.

Notable Recent Updates

  • December 2023, the first gene-editing medication to be sold in the US, Casgevy, has received approval from the FDA. Casgevy treats Sickle Cell Anemia with CRISPR, a technique that won the Nobel Prize. The one-time medication, which will set patients back $2.2 Mn each, was co-developed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics.
  • November 2023, Takeda Pharmaceuticals US Inc. received permission from the FDA to use Adzynma. Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an uncommon and potentially fatal blood clotting condition that affects both adult and pediatric patients. Adzynma is the first recombinant (genetically engineered) protein product approved for on-demand enzyme replacement therapy (ERT).

Healthcare Policies and Regulatory Landscape

Through the regulation and oversight of a wide range of goods, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plays a crucial role in protecting public health by guaranteeing their efficacy and safety. Since its founding in 1906, the FDA—which is housed under the Department of Health and Human Services—has grown to be a well-regarded regulatory body. By regulating and overseeing the safety of foods, dietary supplements, prescription and over-the-counter drugs, vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions, radiation-emitting equipment, veterinary goods, and more, the FDA is primarily tasked with protecting and advancing public health. Pre-market approval, post-market surveillance, and continuous manufacturing practice monitoring are all included in its regulatory framework. In addition, the agency has to make sure that products are labeled accurately, educate the public, and act quickly to address any new health risks. Before new goods hit the market, the FDA evaluates their safety and effectiveness using a strict scientific review procedure. At the same time, it keeps an eye out for any possible hazards with current products.

Competitive Landscape

Key Players:

  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  • Sanofi
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Pfizer
  • Bayer
  • CSL Behring
  • Grifols International
  • Octapharma
  • Xenetic Biosciences
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb 

1. Executive Summary
1.1 Disease Overview
1.2 Global Scenario
1.3 Country Overview
1.4 Healthcare Scenario in Country
1.5 Patient Journey
1.6 Health Insurance Coverage in Country
1.7 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)
1.8 Recent Developments in the Country

2. Market Size and Forecasting
2.1 Epidemiology of Disease
2.2 Market Size (With Excel & Methodology)
2.3 Market Segmentation (Check all Segments in Segmentation Section)

3. Market Dynamics
3.1 Market Drivers
3.2 Market Restraints

4. Competitive Landscape
4.1 Major Market Share

4.2 Key Company Profile (Check all Companies in the Summary Section)

4.2.1 Company
4.2.1.1 Overview
4.2.1.2 Product Applications and Services
4.2.1.3 Recent Developments
4.2.1.4 Partnerships Ecosystem
4.2.1.5 Financials (Based on Availability)

5. Reimbursement Scenario
5.1 Reimbursement Regulation
5.2 Reimbursement Process for Diagnosis
5.3 Reimbursement Process for Treatment

6. Methodology and Scope

US Blood Disorder Therapeutics Market Segmentation          

By Disorder:

  • Anemia
  • Hemophilia
  • Leukemia
  • Myeloma
  • Lymphoma
  • Rare blood disorders

By Product Type

  • Plasma-derived therapeutics
  • Recombinant therapeutics
  • Gene therapy
  • Other therapies

By End User

  • Hospitals
  • Specialty clinics
  • Ambulatory care
  • Home healthcare

Methodology for Database Creation

Our database offers a comprehensive list of healthcare centers, meticulously curated to provide detailed information on a wide range of specialties and services. It includes top-tier hospitals, clinics, and diagnostic facilities across 30 countries and 24 specialties, ensuring users can find the healthcare services they need.​

Additionally, we provide a comprehensive list of Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) based on your requirements. Our curated list captures various crucial aspects of the KOLs, offering more than just general information. Whether you're looking to boost brand awareness, drive engagement, or launch a new product, our extensive list of KOLs ensures you have the right experts by your side. Covering 30 countries and 36 specialties, our database guarantees access to the best KOLs in the healthcare industry, supporting strategic decisions and enhancing your initiatives.

How Do We Get It?

Our database is created and maintained through a combination of secondary and primary research methodologies.

1. Secondary Research

With many years of experience in the healthcare field, we have our own rich proprietary data from various past projects. This historical data serves as the foundation for our database. Our continuous process of gathering data involves:

  • Analyzing historical proprietary data collected from multiple projects.
  • Regularly updating our existing data sets with new findings and trends.
  • Ensuring data consistency and accuracy through rigorous validation processes.

With extensive experience in the field, we have developed a proprietary GenAI-based technology that is uniquely tailored to our organization. This advanced technology enables us to scan a wide array of relevant information sources across the internet. Our data-gathering process includes:

  • Searching through academic conferences, published research, citations, and social media platforms
  • Collecting and compiling diverse data to build a comprehensive and detailed database
  • Continuously updating our database with new information to ensure its relevance and accuracy

2. Primary Research

To complement and validate our secondary data, we engage in primary research through local tie-ups and partnerships. This process involves:

  • Collaborating with local healthcare providers, hospitals, and clinics to gather real-time data.
  • Conducting surveys, interviews, and field studies to collect fresh data directly from the source.
  • Continuously refreshing our database to ensure that the information remains current and reliable.
  • Validating secondary data through cross-referencing with primary data to ensure accuracy and relevance.

Combining Secondary and Primary Research

By integrating both secondary and primary research methodologies, we ensure that our database is comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date. The combined process involves:

  • Merging historical data from secondary research with real-time data from primary research.
  • Conducting thorough data validation and cleansing to remove inconsistencies and errors.
  • Organizing data into a structured format that is easily accessible and usable for various applications.
  • Continuously monitoring and updating the database to reflect the latest developments and trends in the healthcare field.

Through this meticulous process, we create a final database tailored to each region and domain within the healthcare industry. This approach ensures that our clients receive reliable and relevant data, empowering them to make informed decisions and drive innovation in their respective fields.

To request a free sample copy of this report, please complete the form below.


We value your inquiry and offer free customization with every report to fulfil your exact research needs.


Last updated on: 18 April 2024
Updated by: Anish Swaminathan

Related reports (by category)


Related reports (by geography)


subscribe to our newsletter
up